The function that has fallen to myself is to exist whilst being neither attached to the void - nor hindered by phenomena. This is nothing special - but it is essential. I must have no wealth, no reputation, and no influence in the material world. This part is easy – as it is a casual rejection of the cultural norms of the time within which I happen to exist. Having attained to a full understanding of Chinese Ch’an through the Caodong lineage – my personal life is insignificant (it is merely a vehicle for the perfection of others). What is important is that a living individual has realised the void and integrated this realisation into the material world. As I get older the physical body is changing – surely a preparation for death. Again, this is not a difficult undertaking – as all things age, cease to function and dissipate. As I enter a deep samadhi during long periods of meditation - the mind is expansive, embracing of the entire environment – with all things arising and passing away within the void. All is a boundless inner and outer bright light - imbued with pure compassion and transformative wisdom. The physical body that defines me is in the midst of dissolving into this realisation. This is the reality that I am experiencing. A dead body might well result – but this is an ordinary vision of dull understanding experiemced by those left behind. It is a situation after the fact of realising enlightenment. The expanded conscious awareness breaks the barrier between physical matter and ethereal spirit. On occasion, such is the power of this process that the material body literally dissolves and disappears. Whatever the case, it seems that I will enter Parinirvana whilst sat upright in seated meditation. I do not know exactly when this will happen – but instructions have been left for a photograph to be taken. Although I have never met you – pure loving kindness is continuously emitting from the centre of my being. All are embraced without discrimination. Bath in the light of this experience, clear the surface of the mind, still its functionality and clearly perceive the underlying (empty) mind ground. Through further training – this awareness will stabilise and expand. May all beings be happy and free from suffering.
1 Comment
Although eulogised more or less the world over today – Master Xu Yun attracted his fair share of criticism. Although completely indifferent to worldly affairs he was accused of being a ‘rightest’ and a ‘leftist’ at different times in his existence. Those jealous of his spiritual power (and seniority) within the Chinese Buddhist System – accused Master Xu Yun of breaking the very Vinaya Discipline he fervently enforced upon his disciples. Quite often this involved the rules surrounding sexual self-control and celibacy – with Master Xu Yun accused of participating in relations with male acolytes. Of course, there was never any material evidence to substantiate these rumours. At one time a young woman took her clothes-off in front of a meditating Master Xu Yun on a boat packed with witnesses – and he never reacted. It is speculated that this woman was paid to do this in an attempt to secure material evidence regarding Master Xu Yun breaking the Vinaya Discipline. Part of the reason inspiring these baseless attacks involved the Imperial Japanese presence in China between 1931-1945 – which saw an attempt at manipulating the Chinese Sangha into adopting the Japanese Zen practice of NOT following the Vinaya Discipline and allowing Buddhist ‘monks’ to be married, eat meat and drink alcohol. There were some collaborative elements within a rapidly modernising Chinese culture that viewed Master Xu Yun’s attitude as being old fashioned and behind the times. Master Xu Yun, despite this pressure from without and within Chinese culture, nevertheless, refused to buckle and instead reacted with an ever-greater vigour in calling for the upholding of the Vinaya Discipline! When told what others were negatively saying about him, Master Xu Yun would laugh and brush the insult aside. What others said was viewed by Master Xu Yun as being a product of greed, hatred, and delusion – and the very ignorance that following of the Vinaya Discipline sought to uproot and dissolve into the three-dimensional emptiness of the empty mind-ground. Just as following the Vinaya Discipline represented the pure ‘host’ position – the impure ‘guest’ position represented the dirtiness of the ordinary, mundane world and its machinations. Why follow the latter when the former offered safety, sanctuary, and a relief from human suffering? Pretending to be a ‘monk’ when immersed in the filth of the ‘guest’ position of lay-existence is NOT correctly following the Buddha-Dharma as taught by Master Xu Yun. Master Xu Yun shuffled-off his mortal coil 64-years ago (in 1959) – on October 13th (when the Chinese Lunar Callender is converted into the Western Solar equivalent). He was in his 120th-year and had lived nearly two of the 60-years cycles that define the Chinese Zodiac. Although born in the Year of the Rat – and obviously a survivor – Master Xu Yun had no patience for superstition. Indeed, his biography is strewn with accidents, injuries, and the occasional monastic disciplining (involving corporal punishment). None of this bothered him psychologically (as he was ‘detached’ from his feelings) – even if the experience damaged him physically. The question is - how many Buddhist practitioners today are prepared to be like this?
What about the dishonest, the the lying and the deceptive? What happens when such people 'pretend' to seek Ch'an instruction, guidance or clarification? Generally speaking, this is not a problem. If the Ch'an Teacher, Master or Guide has realised the (enlightened) 'host' position, that is the 'empty mind ground', then the questioner - regardless of their apparent 'honesty' or 'dishonesty' - simply represent the (deluded) 'guest' position, and no further explanation is required. The 'honesty' and/or 'dishonesty' of the enquirer means absolutely nothing as the moral-tone of the words such individuals use are all subject (without exception) to being 'returned' to their essential source. The Hua Tou method does not discriminate or support any form of dualistic thinking or acting. The 'enlightening' function is performed by all genuine Ch'an Masters automatically turn ALL words, regardless of the moral orientation of the enquirer, back to their empty essence. When the enquirer is subjected to this process in an appropriate manner, then all delusive constructs 'drop-away' never to arise again.
Richard Hunn (1949-2006) once stated that the underlying (empty) mind ground is the essence of ALL phenomena. This is the same today (in the contemporary UK) as it was during the Court of King Henry VIII as it was in the time of Confucius! When the surface mind is free of all 'klesa' - that is all taints of greed, hatred and delusion (that is the 'asava' or 'effluence') - then all thought and behaviour is automatically an expression of the 'Dao' (道)! Perfecting the ability of 'turning' the mind back to its 'empty' essence in ALL circumstance is what Richard Hunn referred to as 'abiding by the Mind Precept'! The 'Mind Precept' is the essence of all Vinaya and Bodhisattva Vows! Although the mind and body can be disciplined with regard to every single thought and action (one at a time in an endless precession) - the Chinese Ch'an tradition considers it a much more effective (and 'advanced') practice to immediately 'return' the mind (as advocated in the Lankavatara Sutra). This (existential) 'turning' of the mind is the essence of the Caodong School of Ch'an as transmitted by Master Xu Yun (1840-1959). The London Peace Pagoda was built in 1984 by the Greater London Council (GLC) and is situated to the North of Battersea Park (itself constructed during the 1850s). It was designed and founded by a Japanese Buddhist monastic but involves no other commitment than to relinquish ALL inner and outer notions of 'conflict'! This idea aligns exactly with uprooting ALL taints of greed, hatred and delusion in the mind (as 'thoughts') and in the body (as 'actions'). Of course, in a world full of injustice, contradiction and violence - as Buddhists - this burden falls entirely upon ourselves. The world may be 'violent' around us (and even against us) but we must proceed without fear. Doing 'nothing' with a clear and calm mind is far easier than committing all kinds of violent actions - but the habits of delusion are entrenched and very powerful as traits or patterns of cyclic manifestation! It is 'breaking' these cycles of 'action' and 'reaction' which is the most difficult undertaking. And yet it is an undertaking that ALL must take and be successful in applying. Therigatha - Groups of Five Verses A Certain Unknown Bhikkhuni (67) It is 25 years since I went forth. Not even for the duration of a snap of the fingers have I obtained stilling of mind. (68) Not having obtained peace of mind, drenched with desire for sensual pleasures, holding out my arms, crying out, I entered the vihara. (69) (That same) I went up to a bhikkhuni who was fit-to-be-trusted by me. She taught me the doctrine, the elements of existence, the sense-bases, and the elements. (70) Having heard her doctrine, I sat down on one side. I know that I have lived before; the deva-eye has been purified; (71) and there is knowledge of the state of mind (of others); the ear-element has been purified; supernormal power too has been realised by me; I have attained the annihilation of the asavas; (these) six supernormal knowledges have been realised by me; the Buddha's teaching has been done. KR Norman (Translator) - The Elders' Verses II Therigathha, Pali Text Society, Oxford, (1991), Page 11
Richard Hunn (Wen Shu) was NOT keen on any notion of ‘Transmitting’ the Ch’an Dharma. This coincided with his attitude of NOT wanting to be associated with any particular University, Publisher or Dharma Group, etc. I agree with this approach. Dogma, idealism and superstition has nothing to do with genuine Chinese Ch’an Buddhist practice. What an individual does with their mind (and body) regarding attitudes and opinions held concerning life, politics, culture or everyday activities – has absolutely NO interest for the genuine Chinese Ch’an Master! This attitude is encountered time and again throughout the Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties Ch’an writings of Imperial China – with Master Xu Yun (1840-1959) carrying-on this attitude into the post-1911 era of ‘modern’ China! Obviously, I have NOTHING to transmit. Teaching is simply taking the conditions that already exist – and turning the awareness of the enquirer back toward the ‘empty mind ground’ from which all perception arises (and ‘returns’ according to the Chinese Ch’an tradition) - this is a ‘transmission’ in a general sense – but such an interaction cannot be interpreted as an individual in the West being granted ‘Transmission’. Within Chinese culture, such ‘Transmission’ was Confucian in origin and often travelled within birth families and specific name clans – very seldom (if ever) was a ‘Transmission’ initiated ‘outside’ the family (as ‘outsiders’ could not be trusted to use the family secrets of spirituality, science and martial arts properly). Later, when the ‘Transmissions’ of (related) ‘Father to Son’ was adjusted to accommodate (non-related) ‘Masters to Disciples’ - outside ‘Transmissions’ (separate from the Confucian birth-process) was developed. This is the agency of continuation from generation to generation preserved within the Chinese Ch’an tradition. Birth-relationship is replaced with a ‘strict’ attitude of ‘respect’ and the maintaining of ‘good’, ‘correct’ and ‘appropriate’ decorum, behaviour and deportment. Even within ‘modern’ China – this is a difficult interaction to a) perform and b) achieve. The standards for keeping the mind and body permanently ‘clean’ night and day and is often viewed as being far too difficult for the average individual to meet. As ‘Transmission’ is NOT a game and given that ‘Transmission’ within the Chinese Ch’an tradition is NOT the same as ‘Transmission’ within the Japanese Zen tradition – it is obvious that when the Chinese Ch’an tradition ‘flows’ into the West – it is NOT the case that ‘Transmission’ can easily be applied. The empty mind ground must be ‘realised’ (not an easy task) and ‘maintained’ in every situation (an even more unlikely achievement). I have experimented with ‘Transmission’ in the West – but have found that as soon as the event unfolds – an IMMEDIATE ‘dropping away’ of all interactive effort, respect and continuation occurs. This means that the crucial and inherent energy is diminished, sullied and obscured - and the Ch’an lineage loses its clarity, understanding and ability to ‘free’ others. This explains ‘why’ I have eventually WITHDRAWN all so-called ‘Transmissions’ as a means to emphasis the recorded activities of the Chinese Ch’an Masters – written down in China and translated into English by Charles Luk [Lu Kuan Yu] (1898-1978). Granting Chinese language Dharma-Names and formally ‘Welcoming’ individuals into the ‘Lineage’ - does NOT constitute a ‘Transmission’. As helping others is a key element of the Bodhisattva Vow – I do NOT wish to inadvertently ‘damage’ the Chinese Ch’an tradition entrusted to me – by generating what amounts to a ‘dysfunction’ of transmission.
Dear T Thank you for your interesting email. The Chinese Ch'an method - whilst acknowledging the importance of compassion and loving kindness toward others (mediated by wisdom) - nevertheless, stresses that we must 'look within' with power (using the utmost determination) whilst directly perceiving the Empty Mind Ground. This is not a form of mysticism, and has more in common with modern science. The Ch'an method advocates the inner perception of the psychic fabric from which all thoughts and feelings originate within when stimulated by the physical body as it interacts (through the six senses) with the external (material) environment. This Ch'an method is happening NOW as these words traverse the surface of your observing mind. I am using these words in such a manner that is discontinuous and designed to nudge you (gently) out of the usual procedure of superficial communication. The hua tou (word head) method seeks to use words in such a manner that a Ch'an adherent is able to trace each word back to the 'empty' psychic fabric from which it has arisen. There is no '!' mark as I do not wish to direct your attention back to the flow of the writting and assist you in 'missing' the Empty Mind Ground. All Best Wishes Adrian
Those who are beclouded by material desires so as to pervert principles And violate righteousness, do so because they do not think... If they Can truly examine themselves and things, their sense of right and wrong And their choice between right and wrong will have the qualities of quiet Alertness, clear-cut intelligence, and firm conviction. Lu Juiyuan [陸九淵] (1139-1193 CE) - Neo-Confucian Scholar Not being attached to words and letters. Another way of looking at it is ‘not being attached to words and sentences’. Either way – I possess no concern whatsoever where the mind of others is ‘placed’ - as that is entirely under the control of the individual concerned. What is interesting is how many individuals want their attachment to words and letters ‘secured’ when engaging in Ch’an Dialogue or Dharma Combat. In other words, such individuals do not want to be ‘freed’ according to the Ch’an Method – no – such individuals want their deluded minds ‘reinforced’ through a distorted Ch’an Method! Well, this kind of deluded self-delusion is not permitted within the lineage of Master Xu Yun (1840-1959). No surprises – just the reality of penetrating and realising the essence of the empty mind ground. Of course, greed, hatred and delusion does not to know or to be told this – as all the deluded mind wants to do is dominate at the point of contact. But what must we do? How lies the path? How come to vision of the inaccessible Beauty, Dwelling As if in consecrated precincts, apart from the common ways where all may see, even the profane? He that has strength, let him arise and withdraw into himself, foregoing all that is known by the Eyes, turning away forever from the material beauty that once made his joy. Plotinus (204-270 CE) - Neo=Platonist Enneads 1.6 (Ascending Towards the One – 8) This is the age-old quandary of the Ch’an Master. Popularity is replaced with compassion. The ‘hatred’ will increase the nearer the practitioner comes to the realisation of the empty mind ground. Prior to this breakthrough – prior to the bottom dropping out of the barrel – the delusion and greed will do everything it can to preserve its dominance! Indeed, entire industries have formed within the world of pseudo-Buddhism which sees vast empires of hero-worship and elaborate business pyramids all conspiring to keep the greed, hatred and delusion intact that the Buddha taught to overcome and transcend a) thousands of years ago, and b) which is obviously embedded in ALL the Sutras (of whatever tradition). Such is the Ch’an Method. No sentiment, no hindrance and no unnecessary emotion. None of these things matter unless the human mind chooses to make it so. The dust-whisk is either ‘raised’ or ‘lowered’ - that is all that matters in the end – as the body holding the dust-whisk will fall away. It may or may not continue to sit upright for centuries (like Hui Neng, Han Shan and many others) - but it might not – like Master Xu Yun who had his ashes rolled into dough-balls and thrown into a local river to feed the fish! We can practice self-denial as well as compassion for others, thus forgoing all sorts of enjoyment. If we can do so, no one will have to endure suffering and there will remain nothing that cannot be Accomplished. It will follow that we will be able to obtain the full fruit of our reward. Master Xu Yun (1840-1959) - in His 114th Year Sixteen-years ago (1.10.2006) - Richard Hunn (1949-2006) died sat up-right in a hospital bed in a Kyoto Hospital. His final words were ‘Let’s go to the bookshop and buy some Wordsworth!’ Dying is the true test as it happens to ALL living creatures regardless of where the mind is placed in relation to the material world. We are all born, diversify into the material world, and retract into the death process. Inbetween individuals traverse through myriad conditions and circumstance. The Ch’an Method does not deny this process – but it does stop the deluded mind in its tracks and directs it to turn ‘inward’ and to observe the very essence of its functionality. Such a process quite often ennobles material existence and adds meaning to a process that many view as possessing no inherent meaning. Of course, parallels can be found in other philosophical systems providing there is non-attachment to words and sentences. As soon as it becomes ‘this’ system versus ‘that’ system – then the liberating power is dissipated, and all effort ceases to be meaningful. Ch’an is the raft the Buddha gave to cross the river. It is not a system to be attached to and presented like an all-conquering (and ‘one-sided’) system that keeps humanity firmly rooted in this plane of perceptual existence! Many do not like the Ch’an which would free them of their attachments – so be it. The burden is theirs – and theirs alone – to be carried.
The historical (Indian) Buddha traversed through at least six different Brahmanical systems – each with its own ‘Guru’ standing at its pinnacle of practice and attainment! Although the Buddha was confirmed to have achieved ALL levels of attainment in these systems by the presiding Gurus themselves – he felt that these systems were ‘limited’ and stopped short of the ultimate truth! In other words, the Buddha perceived that there was a deeper level of attainment involved in his spiritual search that was not ‘realised’ in the Brahmanical systems he had studied, even though these paths were difficult to follow, and the highest levels of attainment were very rare! Therefore, the Buddha had to set out on his own without a teacher to penetrate reality to a greater degree, although it is true that he had been educated in Yoga, meditation, religious texts (such as the Vedas and the Upanishads, etc), martial arts and all kinds of arts suitable to his Kshatriya (Warrior and King) Caste! Interestingly, at this point in human social and cultural development, reading and writing was known but very rare, (practiced in India only by the ruling house, and only then to record and remember ‘laws’ - assisting in their functionality), and so the Buddha was illiterate despite achieving full and complete enlightenment! (This is similar to the story of Hui Neng – the Sixth Patriarch of the Chinese Ch’an tradition – was both a ‘layman’ and ‘illiterate’ when he inherited the ‘Dharma’).
Despite possessing a very good quality education in the spiritual knowledge of his time, the Buddha finally achieved full enlightenment without a teacher. No specific teacher ‘ordained’ the Buddha and other than sitting resolutely within the meditation posture – the Buddha did not follow any ‘Precepts’. The Buddha perfected the ‘Mind Precept’ whereby he cut-off ALL greed, hatred and delusion (breaking the ‘karmic-root’ of the mind) whilst simultaneously ‘returning’ all six senses to the empty mind ground! Overtime, he taught his ‘Dharma’ and supported and strengthened the practice of his disciples through the passing of hundreds of ‘Precepts’. This body of ‘Precepts’ became known as the Vinaya Discipline, and this is preserved within a number of different with slightly varying interpretations. A member of the Sangha, for instance, is any man or woman who has left society, shaved their heads, put on the robe and committed themselves to the hundreds of ‘Precepts’ the Buddha established – the Buddha also defined a member of the Sangha as any ‘lay’ person who has fully realised enlightenment! This is because the Buddha acknowledged that monastics and lay people are both able to realise enlightenment – but that the monastic path is straightforward with minimum distractions, whilst the lay path is thoroughly deluded and premised upon multiple barriers to the realisation of enlightenment (although such a feat is possible as the Buddha, Vimalakirti and Hui Neng, etc, attest). The term ‘Sangha’ has been extended within the Mahayana tradition to include ALL lay and monastic practitioners within a Buddhist community – whilst within the Theravada School lay Buddhists are definitely NOT included in the term ‘Sangha’ which is reserved only for monastics. The Ch’an tradition understands and recognises all these facts – but does not discriminate in anyway. Why? This is because the empty mind ground underlies all things equally and does not discriminate. If a practitioner can return the sense-data of all six senses back to the empty mind ground – then nothing else matters! This is why the Chinese Vinaya Discipline allows for the concept of ‘Emergency Ordination’ whereby a lay person can shave their heads, set-up a Buddha image and take refuge in the Buddha, Dharma and Sangha (and the Triple Gem within us) - this is probably the original ‘Precepts’. Added to this can be any number of other Precepts if they are known! If not, assume a vegetarian diet and diligently practice seated meditation, Sutra reading and chanting if applicable. A new name can be chosen and applied at this point. The function of ‘Emergency Ordination’ may involve an individual who has realised full enlightenment and does not want to live within lay society. It might also refer to a lay individual who desperately wants to ‘leave’ the delusion of lay society and does not have access to a Buddhist Temple or qualified Master! Emergency Ordination is not a matter of material accumulation and the easy assumption of a new status in life. Such a monastic must remain entirely humble in mind, body (and within the environment they inhabit), and only consider themselves a committed lay person and nothing more! The primary purpose of ‘Emergency Ordination’ is that the world of desire and habit must be left behind and the Precepts fully upheld! All psychological tendency (and behavioural habit) emerges from (and returns to) the empty mind ground – mediated through the six senses! When the mind is impure, then all emanations are conditioned by greed, hatred and delusion. Applying the physical Precepts curtails deluded behaviour on the material plane – whilst returning the six senses to the empty mind ground uproots greed, hatred and delusion, and ‘cuts-off’ all aspects of delusion as they emerge from the deepest level of the mind! Then, there appears a ‘turning about’ in the deepest recesses of the mind so that the ‘inverted’ nature of the human mind (which causes ‘suffering’ by seizing upon thoughts in the mind and mistaking them for objects in the physical environment) is ended. This entire process begins, matures and prevails all due to the power of adhering to the Buddhist Precepts! Chinese Language References: http://bodhi.takungpao.com/sspt/sramana/2015-04/2963223.html https://www.chinabuddhism.com.cn/yj/2013-06-13/2931.html Translator’s Note: There is an all-important ‘Precept’ missing from this Chinese-language encyclopaedia page regarding Buddhist ordination – and that is the principle of the ‘Mind Precept’ (心戒 - Xin Jie). This is the central practice of ‘Caodong’ Ch’an and all genuine Buddhism. Furthermore, it makes no difference whether a practitioner is a ‘lay’ person or an ordained member of the Sangha – as ALL six senses are continuously ‘returned’ to the empty mind ground at all times during the time of day or night. Therefore, the hundreds of rules each monastic has to follow are immediately fulfilled every moment through this device and it is the method all mature monastics use. This is because the Buddhist rules are not upheld one after another as if in sequence – but are upheld simultaneously – all at once! Conversely, a lay person chopping wood and fetching water immediately ‘spiritualises’ these mundane activities by automatically ‘returning’ ALL six sense organs to the empty mind ground – thus upholding not only the ‘5’, ‘8’ or ‘10’ lay Precepts – but every Precept ever conceived (and none at all)! Obviously, if hundreds of Precepts are meticulously upheld - but the empty mind ground has not been realised - then what good are the hundreds of Precepts? Such a superficial practice merely becomes another example of ‘attachment’! Once the empty mind is realised then it is understood that there is no difference between ‘lay’ and ‘monastic’ - and there are no Precepts that can be upheld if they manifest ‘separate’ from the empty mind ground! ACW (26.6.2022)
Anyone who commits themselves to the Buddhist Path (Dharma) should voluntarily observe (or embrace and uphold) the Rules of Discipline (Precepts) in order to purify the mind, body and environment! In so doing, such a practitioner firmly establishes the purity of the Dharma in the world! These rules were first established by the Historical Buddha in ancient India as a means to support the central element of his teaching commonly known as the ‘Dharma’. The ‘Dharma’ is the ‘Word’ of the Buddha whilst the ‘Vinaya Discipline’ is a secondary vehicle of support and clarification of this ‘word’. Different sets of Precepts have arisen due to varying interpretations developing within the many different Schools of Buddhist Thought. As a consequence, the Rules of Discipline are divided into Five (5), Eight (8) and Ten (10) Precepts for the male and female ‘Laity’ - and Complete Systems of Hundreds of Precepts for the fully ‘Ordained’ male and female ‘Upholders of the Dharma’! Invariably, it is a general rule that ‘women’ are required to adhere to more ‘Precepts’ than men. Broadly speaking, these categories can be described as ‘Hinayana’, ‘Mahayana’, ‘Lay’, ‘Monk’ (Bhikshu) and ‘Nun’ (Bhikshuni), etc. With regards to monastic ordination, a practitioner is only considered a full Buddhist ‘monk’ or ‘nun’ AFTER all the Precepts have been transmitted by a competent and qualified Precept-Master, and accepted, upheld and established as a minute-by-minute (daily) practice by the recipient. Prior to this, however, a male or female ‘Novice’ must adhere to the ‘Ten Precepts’ of purity which include (1) Not to Kill, (2) Not to Steal, (3) Not to engage in Sexual Contact, (4) Not to Lie, (5) Not to drink Alcohol, (6) Not to Adorn the body with Perfume, (7) Not to listen to Music or watch or participate in Dancing, (8) Not to sit or lie upon High Beds, (9) Not to Eat Outside od Set Times, and (10) Not to amass (or handle) Silver and Gold! The Buddhist monks of the Theravada School Uphold 227 Precepts, whilst the nuns Uphold 331 precepts. The Buddhist monks in China Uphold 250 precepts, whilst the nuns Uphold 348 precepts – whilst Tibetan Buddhist Lamas Uphold 253 precepts. Chinese Buddhist monks and nuns (who Adhere to the Mahayana) are also required to Uphold the Bodhisattva Precepts. Those monastics who take the Precepts are not allowed to wantonly or casually ‘break’ these Precepts - but they are allowed to declare that they want to abandon these Precepts and return to the unrestrained Secular world. Those who break the Precepts – but who wish to remain a monk or nun - will be punished as a means to resolve the matter of ill-discipline (an action designed to ‘uproot’ the greed, hatred and delusion in the mind and body which led to the infraction). If there are special circumstances, however, and as a matter of both ‘Wisdom’ and ‘Compassion’ - a temporary exception can be applied that involves no punishment. With the Chinese Buddhist monastic tradition there is the convention of applying burning incense cones to specific areas on the ‘Forehead’ and ‘Wrist’ of the ordained Buddhist monk or nun. This is designed, through the resulting pain, to ‘burn’ the importance of the ‘Precepts’ deep into the mind and body of the Practitioner of the Dharma! The pain itself, as it is applied with a ‘Pure Intent’, assists in the uprooting of ‘greed’, ‘hatred’ and ‘delusion’ from the mind and body of the ‘Dharma Practitioner’! Invariably, the resulting ‘Black’ scars are burnt into the skin in rectangular groups of ‘3’, ‘6’, ‘9’ or ‘12’ dots! The ‘Black’ scars often fade to ‘White’ dots – and the more ‘dots’ a practitioner carries – the greater their strength is considered in Upholding the Precepts! When ‘Taking the Precepts’ period is over, the practitioner is issued with a ‘Certificate of Precept-Taking’ and a ‘List of Precepts’ taken, etc. Chinese Language Reference: https://baike.baidu.com/item/受戒/32136 佛教制度 凡皈依佛教的人都应受持戒律,以便更好修行。因不同教派对教义的不同理解,产生了不同的戒条。分为五戒、八戒、十戒、俱足戒等。或小乘戒、大乘戒、居士戒、比丘戒、比丘尼戒等。出家者受持戒法后即成为正式僧尼。 沙弥和沙弥尼必须受持十戒,即不杀生、不偷盗、不淫、不妄语、不饮酒、不涂饰香鬘,不视听歌舞,不坐高广大床、不非时食、不蓄金银财宝 。上座系佛教比丘有227戒,比丘尼有331戒,此传汉地比丘守250戒,比丘尼守348戒,藏传佛教喇嘛持253戒。 信奉大乘的汉地佛教僧尼还须受菩萨戒。凡受戒者不许破戒,但允许声明舍戒还俗。破戒者要受到惩罚。如果遇特殊情况,也可以暂时破例开戒。为表示笃信佛法、虔守佛规,需受戒,即用戒香炙烧头额或手腕,炙成3个、6个、9个或12个黑疤,越多表示越虔诚,戒期完毕,由传戒者发给“戒牒”及“同戒录”。 The Hua Tou method is a re-working of the Buddha’s meditative methods as expounded in the sutras. Whereas the Theravada School deploys an impressive array of rhetorical devises to describe what the Buddha is explaining and what he means with each illustration – the Ch’an School by-passes this hefty methodology and reverts to returning all six senses back to the empty mind ground! That is, everything that is sensed through the six senses is returned to the root of perception and penetrates the exact ‘point’ mid-way between ‘perception’ and ‘non-perception’! Whereas the Theravada School works only with the (enlightened) content of the Pali ‘Suttas’ - the Ch’an School can make use not only of the (enlightened) content found within the Sanskrit ‘Sutras’ but also any ‘sensory’ data emanating from without (or within) the human mind and body! The Theravada School ‘removes’ and ‘filters-out’ all the ‘deluded’ sensory-data (so that the mind and body is ‘purged’ of all influences of greed, hatred and delusion), whereas the Ch’an School makes use of the full reception of sensory-data appearing within the sensory-fields of the six sensory-organs! The Theravada School places the training individual in a sedate and quiet forest setting and in so doing ‘removes’ ALL influences of greed, hatred and delusion. Of course, Ch’an practitioners CAN and regularly DO resort to this type of ‘relocating’ of the mind and body – but not all. There are many examples of Ch’an monastics and Ch’an members of the lay-community – including men, women and children, (and the occasional animal) - who are able, whilst living in the ordinary sensory-stimulus of the everyday world – to realise FULL and PERFECT enlightenment in the model as exemplified by Vimalakirti! How is this achieved? It is achieved by the Ch’an Method of understanding that the entire spectrum of sensory-stimulation (and not just its ‘positive’ aspects) derives from, and has the ‘empty mind ground’ as its base of origination! This means that the Ch’an School recognises the dichotomy found within the Pali ‘Suttas’ comprising of ‘greed’, ‘hatred’ and ‘delusion’ - as opposed to ‘non-greed’, ‘non-hatred’ and ‘non-delusion’ - but differs as to what can be done with this sensory-stimulation. Yes – the ‘non-tainted’ position can be favoured over the ‘tainted’ (as shown with Weekend Ch’an Retreats and the following of the Vinaya, etc) - but equally true is the Ch’an ability to ‘RETURN’ ALL sensory-stimulus BACK to the empty mind ground from which it has arisen! This includes ‘greed’ and ‘non-greed’, ‘hatred’ and ‘non-hatred’ and ‘delusion’ and ‘non-delusion’ - equally! Indeed, in many such cases, the transformation is sudden and dramatic – as is preserved in many ‘gong-an’ records! Therefore, the Theravada Method (exemplified by the excellent teacher Ajahn Chah) specialises in one part (i.e., the ‘good’ over the ‘bad’) section of the sense-organ-data as it is processed through the mind and body. This is important and Buddhism certainly could not afford to exist without this ancient foundation of ‘Dhamma’ skill preserved within the Theravada tradition. However, the Ch’an School also originated from ancient India and represents a similar but different method of utilising the full-range of sense-data stimulus that is available. This explains why certain Ch’an Masters speak of ‘stepping-over’ the ‘holy’ (non-greed, non-hatred and non-delusion) state and the ‘mundane’ (or ‘greed’, ‘hateful’ and ‘deluded’) world or state of being! Even if a Ch’an practitioner separates him or herself from the mundane world and – like the Theravada practitioner – realises ‘emptiness’ and ‘purity’ of mind is a quiet and harmonious forest clearing – then that Ch’an practitioner must eventually ‘return’ to the world of dust and ‘integrate’ this isolated achievement into that reality of full-on and full-spectrum sensory-stimulation! Eventually, regardless of how a practitioner realises the presence of the empty mind ground, this appreciation of the inner void must be integrated (without discrimination) with the outer world and its endless form represented by ‘good’ and ‘bad’ phenomena! Indeed, this is how Vimalakirti entered areas of ill-repute and ‘purified’ them with his presence!
|
AuthorAdrian Chan-Wyles (釋大道 - Shi Da Dao) is permitted to retain his Buddhist Monastic Dharma-Name within Lay-society by decree of the Government of the People’s Republic of China, and the Chinese Buddhist Association (1992). A Buddhist monastic (and devout lay-practitioner) upholds the highest levels of Vinaya Discipline and Bodhisattva Vows. A Genuine Buddhist ‘Venerates’ the ‘Dao’ (道) as he or she penetrates the ‘Empty Mind-Ground' through meditative insight. A genuine Buddhist is humble, wise and peace-loving – and he or she selflessly serves all in existence in the past, present and the future, and residing within the Ten Directions – whilst retaining a vegetarian- vegan diet. Please be kind to animals! Archives
April 2024
Categories
All
|
- Home
- ICBI Blog: Mind-Ground (心地)
- ICBI China Office (Beijing)
- Conference: Ch'an & Zen (2021)
- Master Xu Yun
- Degeneration of the Sangha in the Dharma-ending Age By Ch’an Master Xu Yun
- Ch’an Master Jing Hui - History of Master Xu Yun’s Complete Biographical Text
- Xu Yun’s Humanistic Spirit Transmitted into the Modern Era
- Master Xu Yun & Modern Chinese Politics
- On Why Ch’an Master Xu Yun (1840-1959) Rejected Japanese Zen
- Master Xu Yun Memorial Photographic Library
- Dharma Master Ji Qun (济群) Explains Profound (Dharmic) Happiness
- Chinese Buddhism & Vegetarianism
- Qianfeng Daoism (UK)
-
Ch'an Guild of Hui Neng (慧能禅宗协会)
- CGHN Membership Certificate
- Master Ti Guang – Karma
- Master Ti Guang – Mind That Does Not Deviate
- Meditation Instrument - Fragrant Board
- Ch’an Daily Work
- Horse Hair Dust-Whisk in Chinese Ch’an Buddhism
- Deconstructing the Concept of ‘Shikantaza’
- New Shaolin Temple in China
- Master Yuan Chun: Universal Dharma
- Modern Chinese Art and Ch’an Buddhism
- The Huatou and Pain Management
- Martial Virtue (武德–Wu De)
- Seated Transformation (坐化 – Zuo Hua)
- Guiding Principles
- ICBI Projects
- Membership
- Direction of the ICBI
- Journal of the ICBI
- Contact Us
©opyright: Site design, layout & content International Ch'an Buddhism Institute (ICBI). No part of this site (or information contained herein) unless otherwise stated, may be copied, reproduced, duplicated, or otherwise distributed without prior written permission from [email protected]
Proudly powered by Weebly